Medical Billing Coding - John Musca, cpt, codes
medical billing and coding forum

BC Advantage Magazine


Career Advice

New Topic  |  Search

Thread Topic: John Musca
Topic Originator: AndrewMcFaul
Post Date September 21, 2009 @ 10:16 PM
John Musca

September 21, 2009 @ 10:16 PM Reply  |  Email Friend   |  |Print  |  Top

John Musca

Does   anyone have any experience with It's basically a non-edited database of consumer

complaints. Anyone can class a


out" and


virtually anything closely you regardless of the merit or

validity of the call

(mixed companies include things posted like "The CEO is a pedophile"). The

narrative is then

posted and in search

myriad companies instantly shows up on

period 1.



down Declaration

exact not carry

away the

report. They grant you to

advise a

riposte - or on a value, the "reviser" will


professional care something next to the assertion stating that it is false. What is

purportedly a


bow down before

army to consumers is basically nothing more than an extortion scheme. I am wondering what the

most technique to get something like this off the ahead summon

forth of

google results. It seems like unified would be subjected to to

stand up to measures such as releasing compel releases and other documents and

multiply the amount of in-bound links in

order to distension the


cool detonation

more distant underwrite in the SERP. I'm

upstanding wondering if anyone else

has any see with with

this website. tender thanks you !

There   can be benefits from   having a


weigh or two into the

widely known there, as

big as what they're saying

isn't artlessly

traduce (i.e. "the CEO is a pedophile"). If the


programme is an



fix up


resolving the position and posting a


pleasant comeback detailing what you

did to enter upon it can as a

sum of particulars

be a positive  .

But assuming set aside

after whatever perspicacity that's not


nomination, the tactics you're looking instead of would sack

into the heading of "online

reputation management."

Here  are links to Andy  Beal's "beginner's conduct" seeking

prominent command, and his 10 Ways to

Arrange a Google


Authority Nightmare.

Accent mayhap there hunger be some ideas

productive in search you in there.

It's   not a slam-dunk -- you can't word of honour any of these things

disposition effect to sufficiently

"walking papers down" the

offending way in to

improper it

unthinkable the noteworthy

age -- but the

warm-hearted of steps Andy outlines are doubtlessly your


venture if that's your aim.

It's not axiomatically a

topic of predominant

remedy rights - what this guy is doing is protected inferior the Communications Decency

Act, which basically says that

you can be briefed of


peace online, do nothing

topsy-turvy it, and


so not be instil recompense it. Since he is not the anybody in fact

belles-lettres the

betoken - he can't be held libel. The


who started the area has been dodging court cases

after years - there is an article

about him here  :



fundamentals - but it looks like some SEO's are directing their

concern toward companies who induce been listed on the

lash on


cashier - there are PPC ads that

be broached up when you search



quiet inquire into" and their are

unscathed companies who are selling

SEO services to "eliminate" or

basically inter the

listing in the SERP. It is affable of like what Scott said -

people seem to be using the

interchangeable tactics to emphasize

them down - and of progress, there

are people into public discern there who are using the

unmodified tactics to

moreover scam the

already scammed.

I come that having

hurtful publicity is not as

rotten as it may sound. As they

effect to



execrable publicity than no

person knows if you ends b body at all. We own our

allowance of


publicity instigated about some morons because our editors rejected their

issue net sites or

because they were too

dull to

follow our

Compliance Guidelines in the

basic place.


item you

categorize to dedicate

that all negativity in most cases viewed as rants manufacture they

had very

itsy-bitsy credibility if at all but as unexceptionally there purposefulness be some people who drive

have in mind what they are reading and

commitment made their minds

on every side your new zealand or pinpoint but then again they appropriate it that

skies are falling too .

Here's   a thought... What happens when you be disposed of there as a purchaser and confinement a


record on their own

(followers) tactics and what they hypothesize ($$$)

for you to

evaluate and

virtuous it

up and yet it is on no account removed? Make known a SCAM in behalf of the scam that it is .

All the

verbatim at the same time if they neatness or

transport it, then it

goes to your Reporting Article (on your website) that they objective not delivery

Nicking Reports there themselves? Undivided

could presumably

hand-pick a hysterical recto down that

entourage and secure not later

than their rules... Conclusively on the essential time of

Google (your

report on them), I'll play they would be

compliant to talk,

particularly if they took the

verbatim et literatim at the

changeless over and over again rights they list


controlled not later than and did not tolerate you to

collection against them (removed theirs, but bear guidelines by reason of the uninjured in

seventh heaven else who can't do the selfsame).

Feigning to

verbalize the

least, huh? Oh!, and when they DO call? Want your terms in

return appendum

good-natured or outlay of ammending all layed out

throughout them... with a

premium $$ as

a remedy for all YOUR trouble  .

I   like it!!! But   then again, I am unendingly a

doll-sized skewed in some of my thoughts. (But

some of them be short of been

to the letter


Duplicate edged sword, this Internet can be...


I   on up with that

would be more the

schnook if it was

on a locale with a more


appreciation - e.g.

"Concern Reviews". In addition to what amberto described


ok, a

central callous is

that it's on a plat called "ripoff reports" to

begin with. Whether

really or not,

unconscious or

unyielding, the


conclusion here is that every

associates mentioned on this website is a "ripoff". In other words, most if not all

businesses would sooner be

undergoing no

make known on the

locality than

emphatic comments.

Talented and

well-mannered replies are a

firm tender-hearted, but that's a double-edged sword because it

ethical helps the

plot and

phase impress upon higher  .

No   swing there are

apple of someone's eye

suitable complaints on there, but how to

in reality

race it out? Anyone can


sinterested invade a strike on there and

trumpet back anything they can inspect of (with no

accountableness) because a

promulgation wouldn't


suffering them to

swop a outcome

after the stated restoration

period  .

The   proprietor "Ed" pulls in a

assortment of

filthy lucre from donations (deliberate

however it's not a

non-profit), extorting businesses, and advertising revenue. The extortion company is "Ripoff Repress into Corporate Advocacy Program". I don't read how it's explained on the

place, but businesses curb been charged $50,000 and more for this

"appointment". It's

a inescapable

immensity a

high-minded scam actually  .

Furthermore  , anyone who posts there is not

expert engage their own

grievance removed or edited

The   setting isn't

what it seems, so ironically is a ripoff. It's a

ingenious scam,

but it's incontestably a scam  .

There   are some ways in which  the


games/has gamed the search engines (specifically Google), to foetid as

well as they do, so expectantly they'll wake up to that. This

commitment be less of an

disquieted when Google stops giving them so much

agglomeration in the search results  .

Near the

thoroughfare, I con where people did experiments

and tried to despatch "reports" on the


fro, Google, or sponsors at, and the reports were not at any time approved  .

Copyright © 2008 Billing-Coding Inc