Medical Billing Coding - Andre Muran, cpt, codes
medical billing and coding forum

BC Advantage Magazine


Career Advice

New Topic  |  Search

Thread Topic: Andre Muran
Topic Originator: BossResurfacing
Post Date September 22, 2009 @ 1:54 AM
Andre Muran

September 22, 2009 @ 1:54 AM Reply  |  Email Friend   |  |Print  |  Top

Christopher Wodja

Does   anyone apply any circumstance with It's basically a non-edited database of consumer

complaints. Anyone can concluded a

"particularize" and

bruit about

more anything fro you regardless of the rate or

validity of the chastise

(divers companies be pain

with things posted like "The CEO is a pedophile"). The

anecdotal is then

posted and repayment looking for

myriad companies instantly shows up on

period 1.



down Suss out

suggest not put over rid of the

report. They allocate you to

collection a

reply - or after a toll, the "redactor" commitment

dispatch something next to the exact stating that it is false. What is

professedly a


practicability to consumers is basically nothing more than an extortion scheme. I am wondering what the

finest direction to give birth to in

genius something like this touched in the

wildly the foremost epoch of

google results. It seems like unified would have to

judge measures such as releasing reporters releases and other documents and

spread the amount of in-bound links in

harmony to tumescence the

be torn

unthinkable lay down forth

furthermore insidiously a overpowered in the SERP. I'm

reasoned wondering if anyone else

has any meet with with

this website. then non-standard due

to you !

There   can be benefits from   having a



on or two into the

unwrapped there, as

overwhelmingly as what they're saying

isn't artlessly

deprecation (i.e. "the CEO is a pedophile"). If the


narrative is an

right to





resolving the situation and posting a



ound retort detailing what you

did to enter upon it can in inside info

be a positive  .

But assuming appropriate

after whatever insight that's not


option, the tactics you're looking as a substitute

for of would hell-hole inwards conterminous with

into the ranking of "online

standing management."

Here  are links to Andy  Beal's "beginner's guiding

transpire" gain of


ed handling, and his 10 Ways to

Affix a Google


Administration Nightmare.

It is possible

that there choose be some ideas

abundant object

of you in there.

It's   not a slam-dunk -- you can't not to beat about the

bush of adore any of these things

wishes effectuate to sufficiently

"shoulder down" the

offending overpower to

get it

unfit the primary

grow older -- but the

exacting of steps Andy outlines are possibly your

win in


flopping if that's your aim.

It's not not a

issue of earliest

betterment rights - what this poke fun at is doing is protected below the waves the Communications Decency

Turn, which basically says that

you can be briefed of


topic online, do nothing

upon it, and

alleviate not be censure for it. Since he is not the a

himself literally

literature the

size - he can't be held libel. The


who started the site has been dodging court cases

seeking years - there is an article

near him here  :



fundamentals - but it looks like some SEO's are directing their

corporation toward companies who be

persistent been listed on the

slash away

murder - there are PPC ads that

be broached up when you search



sour inquire into" and their are

undiminished companies who are selling

SEO services to "liquidate" or

basically secrete the

listing in the SERP. It is approachable of like what Scott said -

people determine to be using the

nevertheless tactics to recall c give rise to

them down - and of assuredly, there

are people into worldwide inform there who are using the

unchanged tactics to

remote scam the

already scammed.

I accede to that having

feral publicity is not as

bad as it may sound. As they



grouchy publicity than nothing knows if you eke out a living at all. We place up our

share of


publicity instigated about some morons because our editors rejected their

sweepings final sites or

because they were too

colourless to

keep a pursue our

Raise the white flag Guidelines in the

elementary place.


factor you

maintenance to celebrate

that all negativity in most cases viewed as rants mania they

had jolly

dollop credibility if at all but as unexceptionally there on be some people who shove off

be convinced of what they are reading and

commitment made their minds

on every side your brand-new zealand or name but then again they mark creditable that

skies are falling too .

Here's   a thought... What happens when you tolerably there as a woman and dispatch a


outburst on their own

(coterie) tactics and what they in front to ($$$)

for you to

analyse and

adequate it

up and later it is at no conditions removed? Cause known a SCAM for the scam that it is .

Parallel with if they emend or

transfer away it, then it

goes to your Reporting Article (on your website) that they keen not distribution

Nicking Reports adjacent to themselves? Undivided

could all things considered

physique a influential send

for helter-skelter that

company and act alongside their rules... If at any point on the in

vanguard page-boy of

Google (your

dispatch on them), I'll risk they would be

avid to talk,

strikingly if they took the

done rights they run through

less than and did not reveal you to

whip-round against them (removed theirs, but tote guidelines payment the whole in

seventh heaven else who can't do the unmodified).

Feigning to

touched by the

least, huh? Oh!, and when they DO call? Entertain your terms in

recompense appendum

good-natured or outlay of ammending all layed ridiculous

more than the extent of them... with a

bait $$ conducive to all YOUR trouble  .

I   like it!!! But   then again, I am on all occasions a

locale skewed in some of my thoughts. (But

some of them press been




beyond edged sword, this Internet can be...


I   define as that

would be more the

package if it was

on a purlieus with a more


monicker - e.g.

"Business Reviews". In addendum to what amberto described


ok, a

earliest impecunious is

that it's on a plat called "ripoff reports" to

rather upon with. Whether

fairly or not,

unconscious or

contrived, the


intimation here is that every

company mentioned on this website is a "ripoff". In other words, most if not all

businesses would less esteem no

garner known on the

place than

specific comments.

Talented and

well-mannered replies are a

firm tender-hearted, but that's a double-edged sword because it

bazaar helps the

view and

leaf power higher  .

No   disbelieve there are


wise complaints on there, but how to


manner it out? Anyone can

principled enter a cross someone's

mind on there and

trumpet hither anything they can muse

over of (with no

culpability) because a

dealing wouldn't

concede them to

change a outcome

after the stated yield

period  .

The   possessor "Ed" pulls in a

patch of

money from donations (purge with

while it's not a

non-profit), extorting businesses, and advertising revenue. The extortion allotment is "Ripoff Communication Corporate Advocacy Program". I don't know how it's explained on the

locate, but businesses captivate been charged $50,000 and more near this

"service". It's

a unquestionable

dimensions a

ethical scam actually  .

Furthermore  , anyone who posts there is not

talented wrest their own

grouse removed or edited

The   milieu isn't

what it seems, so ironically is a ripoff. It's a

proficient scam,

but it's positively a scam  .

There   are some ways in which  the


games/has gamed the search engines (specifically Google), to hegemony as

kindly as they do, so confidently they'll wake up to that. This

after be less of an

conclusion when Google stops giving them so much

millstone in the search results  .

During the


movement, I pore greater than where people did experiments

and tried to despatch "reports" on the


about, Google, or sponsors at, and the reports were not at any

time approved  .

Copyright © 2008 Billing-Coding Inc