logo
Overcoming Prior Authorization Challenges With Technology

Practice Management

Overcoming Prior Authorization Challenges With Technology

The latest survey from the American Medical Association (AMA) reveals the significant challenges posed by prior authorization in healthcare. Prior authorization, a process insurers use to manage healthcare utilization and control costs, often disrupts patient care, burdens physicians with administrative tasks, and wastes healthcare resources.

 

The Consequences of Prior Authorization

 

Conducted in December 2023, the AMA survey paints a stark picture of the impact of prior authorization:

 

  • Patient Harm: Nearly one in four physicians (24%) reported that prior authorization has led to serious adverse events, including hospitalization, permanent impairment, or death. Furthermore, 93% of physicians observed a negative impact on clinical outcomes, and 94% noted delays in accessing necessary care, often causing patients to abandon their treatment due to struggles with health insurers.
  • Administrative Burdens: Physicians complete an average of 43 prior authorizations per week, consuming about 12 hours of physician and staff time. Over a quarter (27%) of these requests are often or always denied, contributing to increased burnout, with 95% of physicians indicating that prior authorization significantly increases their burnout.
  • Wasted Health Resources: An overwhelming 87% of physicians stated that prior authorization requirements lead to higher overall healthcare utilization. This includes diversion of resources to ineffective initial treatments, additional office visits, urgent or emergency care, and hospitalizations, indicating significant waste rather than cost savings.

 

These findings highlight the urgent need for comprehensive reforms in the prior authorization process. The AMA strongly advocates for state-level reforms and supports federal legislation to streamline prior authorization procedures within Medicare Advantage, aiming to prioritize patient access to care, reduce administrative burdens, and preserve resources for high-quality care.

 

In-Depth Survey Results

The latest "AMA Prior Authorization Physician Survey" underscores the persistent challenges that physicians face with prior authorizations, a strategy payors use to ensure necessary treatments. However, most physicians agree that this tactic does not benefit them or their patients.

 

The survey included 1,000 practicing physicians (400 primary care and 600 specialists), revealing that 94% experience care delays due to prior authorizations, and 78% say that prior authorizations can sometimes lead to treatment abandonment.

 

For some patients, these outcomes have severe consequences. Almost a quarter (24%) of respondents reported serious adverse events, including hospitalization (19%), life-threatening events (13%), and disability, permanent damage, or death (7%).

 

Administrative burdens are also a significant concern. Physicians complete an average of 43 prior authorizations per week, with staff dedicating about 12 hours to this task. Some staff members work exclusively on prior authorizations. Moreover, 73% of physicians reported an increase in denials over the past five years, while only 3% saw a decrease. Despite the rise in denials, less than one in five physicians always appeal adverse decisions due to pessimism about success, the urgency of patient care, and insufficient resources.

 

Even when appeals are made, the process is flawed. Only about 15% of physicians in peer-to-peer reviews believed the health plan’s peer had appropriate qualifications, although the frequency of such reviews has increased over the last five years.

 

Prior authorizations also lead to greater overall healthcare utilization, as reported by 87% of physicians. Ineffective initial treatments (69%) and additional office visits (68%) are primary contributors, with emergency department visits (42%) and hospitalizations (29%) also noted.

 

NantLink™ - A Streamlined Solution

 

In response to these challenges, NantHealth introduced NantLink, an innovative electronic health record (EHR) interoperability and point-of-care solution designed to automate provider workflows, reduce administrative burdens, and enhance the healthcare experience.

 

NantLink integrates seamlessly with Electronic Medical Record (EMR) systems, providing healthcare providers with direct access to insurance information inside of their EMR. This enables them to perform eligibility and benefits (E&B), claims and authorization interactions from the system where they conduct most of their work. This technology aims to enhance workflow efficiency, with the objective of allowing providers to make informed decisions with a more holistic understanding of their patients’ medical history and potential risks. NantLink’s goal is to simplify collaboration with health plans, making it easier for providers to work directly with them.

 

The AMA survey highlights the detrimental effects of prior authorization on patient care, physician well-being, and healthcare resources. As the medical community and legislators push for necessary reforms, technologies like NantLink offer a promising solution. Dr. Haris Naseem, CEO of NantHealth, emphasizes, "We aim to empower providers to navigate the complexities of the healthcare system more effectively. NantLink is designed to give providers the tools they need to streamline their workflows and take control of their interactions with insurance companies and pharmaceuticals." With solutions like NantLink, the future of healthcare looks brighter, focusing on connectivity, collaboration, and comprehensive patient care.

 

Source: https://nanthealth.com/

 

 

 

 

Auditing the Global Package

Auditing

Auditing the Global Package:When auditing provider services, what is the best method to approach the concept of a global package? Some rental companies provide a renter with all-inclusive pricing for an apartment. The payment arrangement covers heating, electricity, water, and garbage for the one-bedroom apartment.
The Difference Between Autonomous Coding and Computer-Assisted Coding

Coding

The Difference Between Autonomous Coding and Computer-Assisted Coding:Computer-Assisted Coding (CAC) software tools like the ones offered by Optum and 3M are used by medical coders to assist with coding workflow. On the other hand, Fathom's medical coding automation platform is an AI-powered medical coding service, replacing medical coders for the charts it is able to automate.
8 Common Medical Coding Errors That Could Impact Your Practice

Coding

8 Common Medical Coding Errors That Could Impact Your Practice :Government and private insurers have identified instances of improper medical billing practices through audits, highlighting the importance of accurate coding to avoid penalties and maintain a successful practice.
What Is the Goal of Revenue Cycle Management?

Practice Management

What Is the Goal of Revenue Cycle Management?:All healthcare practices are focused on the same thing: achieving the best possible outcomes for their patients. It also requires paying attention to the business side of the healthcare practice–after all, if your practice is routinely running into cash flow issues and struggling to get paid on time, it's going to be that much harder to accomplish your goals without a strong revenue cycle management system.
Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System

Coding

Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System:Here's a summary of the main points covered:
The New ICD-10-PCS Codes for the 2025 Fiscal Year (FY)

Coding

The New ICD-10-PCS Codes for the 2025 Fiscal Year (FY):The 2025 ICD-10 Procedure Coding System (ICD-10-PCS) files below contain information on the ICD-10-PCS updates for FY 2025. These 2025 ICD-10-PCS codes are to be used for discharges occurring from October 1, 2024 through September 30, 2025.
Understanding and Correctly Reporting CPT Modifier 25

Billing

Understanding and Correctly Reporting CPT Modifier 25 :Modifiers in medical coding serve to indicate specific circumstances that alter the usual definition of a service or procedure, often in response to payment policy requirements established by various entities. Detailed definitions of these modifiers can be found in Appendix A of the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®) 2023 code set.
SYNERGEN Health welcomes highly experienced CFO Jolene Varney to its Advisory Board

Practice Management

SYNERGEN Health welcomes highly experienced CFO Jolene Varney to its Advisory Board:SYNERGEN Health, an industry-leading provider of technology-enabled revenue cycle services and solutions for healthcare organizations, today announced the appointment of Jolene Varney to the SYNERGEN Health Advisory Board.
Crafting a Comprehensive Approach to Billing Compliance

Billing

Crafting a Comprehensive Approach to Billing Compliance:The convergence of internal and external market dynamics presents a golden opportunity for healthcare finance leaders to reassess their billing and compliance procedures. Externally, both federal and commercial payors are intensifying audits and scrutinizing pre-payment claims, delaying cash flow, increasing the risk of penalties and clawbacks, and jeopardizing the financial bottom line of healthcare organizations nationwide.?
Health Insurers Are Ignoring Price Transparency Rules at the Expense of Private Practice

Billing

Health Insurers Are Ignoring Price Transparency Rules at the Expense of Private Practice:Since January 1, 2023, the Transparency in Coverage Rule required health insurance providers and health insurers to provide price information to participants in a publicly accessible place. This means consumers should, in theory, be able to go to any payor’s website and see what different doctors, hospitals, and health systems are charging for the same services. The law was meant to allow consumers the ability to shop for healthcare services based on cost and, thus, hopefully lower their healthcare expenditures.
Understanding the Intricacies of RAF Coding: A Comprehensive Guide

Coding

Understanding the Intricacies of RAF Coding: A Comprehensive Guide:In the complex ecosystem of healthcare, Risk Adjustment Factor (RAF) coding stands as a crucial methodology, particularly within the Medicare Advantage (Part C) framework. This article offers a deep-dive exploration into RAF coding, examining its historical origins, the intricacies of the risk adjustment model it employs, the application of the RAF score, and the profound influence of chronic versus acute conditions on these scores and reimbursement rates.
Modernizing Auditing and Compliance in Healthcare

Auditing

Modernizing Auditing and Compliance in Healthcare:The Importance of Auditing - Regular auditing of medical charts and coding documentation is indispensable for identifying errors, ensuring regulatory compliance, and reducing the risk of fraud. Audits not only uncover coding inaccuracies but also offer valuable insights into areas for improvement within the organization's processes and procedures.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Get More - BC Magazine

Subscribe now to access more resources than ever before!

Magazine | CEUs | Webinars